[Fdu] "Nothing Less Than a Public Inquiry Will Do": Carleton's Hassan Diab and a parliamentary petition
Cynthia Wright
cynthia.wright at utoronto.ca
Wed Jul 11 13:48:12 EDT 2018
Hassan Diab: Nothing Less Than a Public Inquiry Will Do
Anti-Racism <https://socialistproject.ca/category/anti-racism/>, Canada
<https://socialistproject.ca/category/canada/> • July 11, 2018 •
Michelle Weinroth <https://socialistproject.ca/author/michelle-weinroth/>
He has been compared to Alfred Dreyfus
<https://socialistproject.ca/2018/01/justice-hassan-diab-unbearable-banality-evil/>,
the iconic 19th-century French victim of false accusation and racism.
The entire spectrum of the Canadian press has covered his unfolding
story since its inception in 2007. His return to Canada from France in
January 2018 was breaking news <http://www.cbc.ca/1.4484443>. An Ottawa
sociology professor, Dr. Diab is the Canadian citizen who, at the behest
of France, was sought for extradition. Subject to allegations of
involvement in the bombing of a Paris synagogue in 1980, he was pursued
and harassed by the RCMP in 2008. Arrested on November 13th of that
year, denied bail, and jailed in the disreputable Ottawa Carleton
Detention Centre
<https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/photo-galleries/a-rare-look-inside-the-ottawa-carleton-detention-centre-1.3134628>,
he was then released in April 2009, only to be placed under the most
draconian house arrest conditions. In 2014, after prolonged and suspect
hearings, his extradition to France was sealed.
Warm welcome for Hassan at Ottawa airport, January 15, 2018.
A decisive moment came on July 28, 2009 when Dr. Diab’s summer teaching
appointment at Carleton University became public. The news provoked a
most vilifying statement from the B’nai B’rith
<https://www.meforum.org/campus-watch/articles/2009/the-b-nai-b-rith-and-hassan-diab>,
which the latter sent post haste to Carleton University: “The safety and
security of the community as a whole … are of great concern to us. … The
last place in the world where this man belongs is in a university
classroom, in front of impressionable students.” Carleton University
yielded to this external pressure and unceremoniously terminated
<http://www.socialist.ca/node/3551> Dr. Diab’s summer contract.
Extradited to France
Between 2010 and 2011, Dr. Diab endured a highly prolonged, dubious, and
exasperating process of extradition hearings
<https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/judge-blasts-france-in-bombing-case-83868902.html>,
grounded in secret, unsourced intelligence
<https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2017/07/10/ottawa-must-seek-justice-for-hassan-diab.html>
that confounded even the extradition judge.
<https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/judge-clears-way-for-ottawa-professors-extradition-on-bomb-charges/article585880/>
Barely convinced by the convoluted logic of the case, the judge
nonetheless ordered the extradition. Dr. Diab’s lawyer, Don Bayne,
produced an eminently powerful appeal that was denied at every court
level. His eloquent plea to the Minister of Justice (Rob Nicholson) was
cavalierly dismissed.
<https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-hassan-diab-s-case-1.2099917>
In 2014, Dr. Diab was extradited to France
<https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/decision-to-extradite-terror-suspect-diab-upheld-1.1823203>.
Compelled to leave in haste, he departed with but four items of clothing
and no chance to say goodbye. His wife and toddler were left hanging in
utter desperation. Thus began the next phase of Dr. Diab’s ordeal –
three years and two months in a maximum-security French prison
(Fleury-Mérogis) for a crime he never committed and for which he was
never even charged.
Rania Tfaily, his wife, describes his coerced departure as a nightmare.
As if sucked down the vortex of a black hole, he remained incommunicado
for an entire month. She received no direct word of his whereabouts or
of his welfare. A Carleton University professor, she was seven months
pregnant with her second child at the time, left to agonize in solitude
with no relief from her nightmare. The heart-wrenching questions from
her bewildered toddler daughter came regularly: “Where’s daddy?”
The case of Dr. Diab represents a shocking miscarriage of justice,
committed by sundry Canadian and French authorities that /presumed/ him
guilty, and were driven to see that such a perception would stick in the
public’s mind. Their actions upended Dr. Diab’s life, subjected him,
along with his wife, to years of torment and humiliation, all on a
contrived allegation – involvement in a terrorist bombing at a Paris
synagogue in 1980 – a groundless accusation issued by a foreign state
and inflamed by rumour and racism.
Dr. Diab’s ordeal can be attributed in part to France. CBC recently
learned <https://www.cbc.ca/1.4714307> that when French authorities made
a formal extradition request to Canada, they “were aware of – and failed
to disclose – fingerprint evidence that ultimately helped to clear
Hassan Diab of committing a terrorist attack … [C]ourt documents show
French prosecutors denied the evidence even existed.” Having already
analyzed Dr. Diab’s fingerprints in 2008, and having ascertained a
mismatch months before making the extradition request, they /knowingly/
pursued the wrong man.
Canada Implicated
But Canada is equally implicated in this affair. Our deeply defective
extradition law, which overrides the individual’s Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, allowed blatantly false evidence from France to justify
sending Dr. Diab to indefinite “purgatory,” to languish in solitary
confinement in a maximum-security prison for more than three years. But
it was not only the law that facilitated this unjust extradition; it was
also /agents of the law/ who “pro-actively” sought it.
Three key elements stand out in this embroiled narrative and they are
now the object of intense public concern: 1) France framed Dr. Diab by
denying that it knew (already in 2008) that his fingerprints did not
match those of the suspected bomber; 2) Canada’s flawed extradition law
deprives the sought individual of the right to invoke evidence in his
own defense beyond the record of the case (e.g., Hassan Diab was not in
France during the 1980 bombing attack, but was not allowed to bring
forth this alibi); and 3) Canadian officials in the Department of
Justice, at the direction of a senior lawyer, Claude Lefrançois,
actively propped up the French extradition case, delaying court
procedures and withholding vital information.
In November 2009, Lefrançois requested a comparative analysis of
fingerprints. In early 2010, the RCMP produced the analysis. The
fingerprints did not match. Lefrançois would have known this throughout
the extradition hearings, yet he never shared the information with the
defence or showed it to the Canadian judge who made the extradition
order. In fact, Lefrançois “…regularly exchanged memos with his French
counterparts pushing for and obtaining court delays until the French
authorities could find a “smoking gun
<https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-hassan-diab-is-another-canadian-let-down-by-our-government/>”
– handwriting analysis that would guarantee Dr. Diab’s extradition. And
while “that hunt for case-saving evidence continued, court transcripts
show Lefrançois repeatedly told the court <https://www.cbc.ca/1.4614855>
he had no direct knowledge of what France was doing – despite having
directed France to find the evidence.”
For a decade, then, France concealed possession of fingerprint evidence
that would have refuted allegations against Hassan Diab. But for eight
years, Canadian government officials /also/ knew that Dr. Diab’s
fingerprints did not match those of the suspected bomber. They concealed
this fact from the court, acting underhandedly to abet a French
extradition request
<http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hassan-diab-case-calls-question-canadas-extradition-process-181226756>
that was tainted from the outset.
These alarming disclosures beg fundamental questions: how and why did
our former government facilitate the extradition of one of its citizens
by withholding critical information that would otherwise have saved him
years of torment? Given this egregious irregularity in judicial and
government proceedings, and given that Canada’s extradition law offers
few, if any, safeguards to protect the requested individual from
extradition, it behooves all Canadians to ponder seriously the extent of
their civil liberties.
One Man’s Ordeal
The case of Hassan Diab recalls the canary in the mine. From the depths
of one man’s ordeal, it illuminates a warning sign that we must all
heed. Any one of us, however innocent, could fall into the same dark
hole of hell that swallowed Dr. Diab for ten years.
Now fully informed of Dr. Diab’s story, Canadians are petitioning
<https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-1674>
the Government to set up an /independent and public/ inquiry: 1) to
study the actions of Canadian officials involved in abetting the cause
of a foreign state by actively promoting the extradition of Dr. Diab;
and 2) to launch a substantive revision of Canada’s extradition law that
trumps Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Government must act
expeditiously on this matter, on behalf of every one of us, but most
importantly, on behalf of Dr. Diab and his family. Only then will
justice be served. •
For more information, see justiceforhassandiab.org
<http://www.justiceforhassandiab.org>.
Petition to the Government of Canada
<https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-1674>
e-1674 (Hassan Diab)
The Petition is open for signature until September 13, 2018.
Michelle Weinroth is a writer and teacher living in Ottawa.
<https://socialistproject.ca/2018/07/slovenia-parliamentary-elections-xenophobic-right/>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.physics.utoronto.ca/pipermail/fdu/attachments/20180711/1fb0962c/attachment.html>
More information about the Fdu
mailing list